A poor balance, but maybe we should say "poor budget."
The bottom line, for now, appears to be linked not so much of the work together with Office Accounting and Financial Managers City of Industry Calolziocorte the inadequacy of those at the national level should provide guidelines for preparing financial statements.
Very little is to be observed on the budget 2011. The same mayor said recently, as the basis for this year are not encouraging and as the public works will inevitably reduced to a minimum. It is pleasing to note that these statements are in line with the utterances made by the undersigned to the press during November last year.
From accounting point of view of the current account balance is achieved by using income from the building permit.
Chapter in the story is of the unknown weights where AUSM the outcome of the tender for the concession of the service of gas distribution. In the same "opinion of one reviewer," it shows this "neo" of the investment, because "in this regard it is noted that the state economic performance could be expected in late 2010, most likely, negative. In this case it is considered that the City Administration will determine the relationship differently on services directly contracted to AUSM.
Returning to the responsibilities of legislators "core" by the report you will learn how the councilor:
1. To refuse tax, the provisions of the new Environmental Code (Legislative Decree no. 152/2006), which provides for the repeal Ronchi Decree, have not entered into force because they were not issued the necessary implementation measures
2. For the reduction of transfers, the Conference State - City failed to determine the criteria and thus spoke the Ministry of Interior for the year 2011 has quantified the loss of revenue apportioned for Calolziocorte amounts to little more of 430,000 €
3. For debt, the municipalities can increase their debt at 31 December of the previous level not exceeding the rate determined annually by special decree (art.77-bis c.10 L. 133/2008) to date has not been adopted
4. Reduction of certain types of expenditure, the Decree 78/2010 provides that within 120 days after the entry into force of the decree (Sept. 30) a measure of the Interior Ministry will cut the amount of compensation to the Executive. The deadline for implementing decree has expired but has not been approved.
We wonder then: In addition to the legal quagmire of what these delays are due or these shortcomings? Pace of the "advertised" simplification rules.
The commissioner in his budget presentation by saying how he made his debut for the time you can defer approval on handling of municipal federalism. In fact you can not gloss over what appears to be the crux of the matter.
Pending defined decrees relating to federalism and regional and provincial standard costs with them - we know how important this issue since 70% -80% of revenue is used to give regional coverage to expenditure on health - focus analysis on Decree 292 on municipal taxation and in these days he arrived at the bicameral committee.
The decree provides for two phases: a transient from 2011 to 2013 and a fully operational from 2014 onwards. During the transition phase the state allocates to municipalities a number of central government taxes on the transfer and possession of property. Someone in the government majority suggests that there is new money flowing into the coffers of the municipalities. In reality it is not, because resources must be devoted to finance a new "fund balance" to replace the current transfers to municipalities / fees, which are simultaneously abolished. In 2011 the municipalities will take the same money that they would take with the current system (with cuts already included and accounted for). What will happen in 2012-2013 is already less clear, because the decree does not say, referring to successive ministerial decrees.
do not know how will change and how they will be allocated the resources of the fund balance in 2012-2013.
is to be hoped that the fate of these Orders is different from the four examples mentioned above.
Once fully operational in 2014, the situation is even more enigmatic. In 2014 the central government taxes donated in 2011 (except dry coupon rents) should largely disappear and be replaced by the new municipal taxes Unica (IMU).
At this point we do not know what happens to the fund balance and equalization between the municipalities, because the decree (easily downloaded from the website of the Senate) does not say. How much will actually dell'IMU municipalities and how much the state is unknown.
Then there are the common "winners" and "losers." Those winners are those for which the excess charges paid transfers abolished. Among therefore these are the municipalities that have housing wealth (including second homes). E 'implies that some of the money will be transferred to the municipalities winning losers by fund balance. If not, the state should take charge of equalization, contrary to the principle of delegated legislation. It is not known yet - neither state nor common, nor have defined the Anci - dell'IMU how much a municipality will have to return to the fund.
This entry is highly dependent from the evolution of the real estate market. This uncertainty creates difficulties in the definitions of expenditure and will impact mainly on small municipalities. It seems incongruous to imagine a federal budget based heavily on real estate assets.
why is the union of municipalities - as we noted in some previous city councils - as a futuristic way. Perspective should be provided incentives for local associations. Promoting joint participation in the consolidation of services and administrative offices would achieve tremendous benefits.
This observation is important when you consider that a delegation and the decrees of the law is that of invariance of overall spending and tax burden. E 'is a key factor especially in the delicate phase that characterizes the public finances. The technicians say that financial hedges services there are, or seem uncertain. The data say that for the next biennium 2011-2012 are missing more than three billion euro.
E 'then founded fear that the municipalities, especially those who see the collapse of its revenue to ensure its survival will be forced to push up the lever of additional - if not this year because the tax concerns Calolziocorte remains fixed at 0.2% - and especially a need for further heavy increases in charges for water, sanitation, child care, cultural services and care to children and the elderly. Admittedly
- referring to the councilor to the budget report - that with regard to the administration Calolziocorte "who wants to have a choice of an exceptional nature, is committed to maintaining the level of social services now provided, drawing on part of the burden of urbanization received, which by their nature should be used to finance expenditure investment. "
E 'on this basis that it is appropriate right now that is common to provide a minimum capacity of tax by the bicameral committee. The proposed transfer of a share IRPEF 2% appears acceptable and desirable. It 'also a good example of how a portion of the tax charged on the public-in particular those working - Can be reinvested directly in the territory.
some cover but above all ensure the provision of services.
The municipal taxation, therefore, is a reform that, in times of financial crisis, could have a fiscal impact and budgetary NGOs. If
- how to say more - federalism is an act of responsibility, I would say that instead of threatening to go to vote if the approval of the decrees did not happen on time, on the contrary it is more useful to take a few more weeks. This in the hope that everything is designed to establish clear rules and decisive so as to not bring himself to refer problems to the near future.
Luca Valsecchi
0 comments:
Post a Comment