Ignazio Marino reply to this' editorial Panebianco :
A majority party in breath
means autonomy and be able to aggregate
Dear Director,
Angelo Panebianco has given us a stimulating point of view of the Democratic Party. With a certain brutality warns us about the "lack of credibility of policy, the lack of a set of ideas and proposals have the potential to convince a significant portion of voters." Take advantage of the incentive to offer a few thoughts.
The idea of \u200b\u200bthe party with "breath" majority, that I am defending, it means the ability to offer Italy a political story - that of values, ideas and proposals - strong and strategic, just to compete, as Panebianco suggests, the challenge of electoral representation is not partisan at a tactical level agreements (which are rather later).
The Democratic party or independent, strong and aggregator, or is not. And if we think that to win we have to decide on alliances before you know who we are, who we will never know. That's why I said that I find it difficult today a strategic alliance with the UDC, which divide us identity values \u200b\u200b(else the possibility of local projects, based on common administrative programs and the autonomy of each area).
The Pd (I think) is a force that is not afraid to make clear choices on issues that now divide us, to say that we are on the side of individual rights, we defend the idea of \u200b\u200bsecularism as a method of discussion and decision, without being custodians of the truth, but with no doubt that lets you listen to each other and to respect the decisions taken by majority vote.
Civil rights, the wide scope of issues that affect the life, health, personal freedom and balance with the environment issues are not marginal, but indicate, in fact, our identity as a progressive force.
Then there are the ideas on an alternative vision in the simplified model of Berlusconi. "It is yes, no and no, everything else is evil" says a sentence of the Gospel to me dear, and this is the principle that inspired the program that I propose. You can agree or not, but still challenge you to find the old ambiguity: no to nuclear power, for example, or a flexible labor market and secure, with a single contract, minimum wage and basic income. Or, again, not all forms of political interference in appointments, the health Rai. It is the single-member districts to upgrade their representation. These are just examples, but point the way: do not say what should or sondaggistico follow common sense, but just say what we believe.
Another example, on immigration, which correctly states the theme Panebianco decisive. Immigration is a resource for Italy, economic and social, of which we can not do without. We talk a lot of rejections, which we reject, but we know that is not the sea that reaches the majority of illegal immigrants. It is the propaganda that problems are resolved. I suggest four things: temporary residence permits for the job search, rigid methods of control and verification of the inputs - on the American model, with electronic documents, fingerprints and iris control, absolute firmness to those who break the rules - jus soli for to be an Italian who was born and raised by us, the right to vote in local elections.
Ignazio Marino
September 14, 2009
0 comments:
Post a Comment